windsofwar (
windsofwar) wrote in
imeeji_frontstage2019-12-11 10:41 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- !days 180-189,
- !lives,
- amakura tomoe,
- five hargreeves,
- xia igarashi,
- ♪ giorno giovanna,
- ♪ hlasoh,
- ♪ kharg,
- ♪ shinguji korekiyo,
- ♪ sonia aragona,
- ♪ todoroki shouto,
- ♭ kaiba seto,
- ♭ norie,
- ♯ catra,
- ♯ catra (au),
- ♯ damian wayne,
- ♯ echo of ♯ noise,
- ♯ harukawa maki,
- ♯ kano shuuya,
- ♯ leonardo watch,
- ♯ nero
Live!!
Who: resident dragon man and you
Where: Lobby
When: 184 morning
Good morning, everyone! I've decided now is the best time for us all to have another debate, now that our guests have been excused.
As many of you know, most of those guests were like me. Damned from other shows, instructed to take part in the show to make it more entertaining. During the week, we all saw and did many things, and hopefully, no one is holding much of a grudge.
Especially toward Future is Now, because I offered to murder, but they refused, and tried to protect as many people as possible, and we still were victorious, some how. So they should be applauded!
That aside, there was also that. . .live. As someone who has also stabbed a child, it made me think. How exactly do I want to reach my goals, and what should I sacrifice to get there? Personally, I don't think my stance has changed much, but we definitely shouldn't stab children. Only deimos! So I apologize for my brash actions from before.
So my question for the rest of you, even though violence can't be completely avoided here, when is it an appropriate first choice of action? I imagine many of you may have had to make extremely hard calls this week, so I have to wonder. Please discuss.
Where: Lobby
When: 184 morning
Good morning, everyone! I've decided now is the best time for us all to have another debate, now that our guests have been excused.
As many of you know, most of those guests were like me. Damned from other shows, instructed to take part in the show to make it more entertaining. During the week, we all saw and did many things, and hopefully, no one is holding much of a grudge.
Especially toward Future is Now, because I offered to murder, but they refused, and tried to protect as many people as possible, and we still were victorious, some how. So they should be applauded!
That aside, there was also that. . .live. As someone who has also stabbed a child, it made me think. How exactly do I want to reach my goals, and what should I sacrifice to get there? Personally, I don't think my stance has changed much, but we definitely shouldn't stab children. Only deimos! So I apologize for my brash actions from before.
So my question for the rest of you, even though violence can't be completely avoided here, when is it an appropriate first choice of action? I imagine many of you may have had to make extremely hard calls this week, so I have to wonder. Please discuss.
no subject
Obviously I'm not saying anyone should sit back and do nothing, but there's a fucking long way from "nothing" to "force them to slowly lose their emotions and memories until they vanish from existence entirely." You're acting like that's the best option when really you're just desperate to find some way to actually make an impact. That's understandable. We all feel that way. But your desperation isn't justice.
no subject
Excuse me, someone did what?
No, what God and Amy did is still far worse than what we normally accept, and so was that.
Call it desperation if you want— I won't pretend there's no desperation at all in me, after everything. But I would still rather take what agency we have than give monsters free reign. What we call "killing" isn't even death; it's just a delaying tactic.
...Has no one done anything about that other murder?
no subject
Like I said, I understand feeing helpless. But have you ever started to gradually lose both your color and everything else about yourself that you've gathered, helpless to stop it as you slowly fade away? Not that going to visit Lilith is exactly a vacation, either.
You're not talking about just killing. You're talking about inflicting torture way worse than what they did. Physical pain is temporary, and as you say, even death doesn't last.
And even in the real world where death is permanent, we didn't know that there wasn't somewhere else that their souls went. Here we know, for certain, we'd be destroying them. Don't tell me that's justified. And don't act like it's a choice between that and giving free reign to do whatever.
no subject
Is that really what you think is happening? [ from her tone, it's not a rhetorical question ]
In my own world, we do know what happens to the souls of the dead: When they are ready, they drink from the river of forgetting, and pass on to the next life. Losing their memories and identity is part of that. So I am being very honest when I say that I saw the greying like that, even if it is horrible to inflict on a living person.
As far as I've been concerned, the grey death really has seemed like the only real death there is, here, and in more ways than one.
no subject
And yes, that's what I think is happening. You want to inflict something so horrible that no one has actually done it, here, and you won't even admit it's because you feel angry and impotent. You think it's the natural response, that it's justified, that everyone should be able to see that. To me, that's way more dangerous than anything God and Amy could do.
no subject
As for what I think:
Do you need to hear me say that I am angry, and that it makes me even more angry that we have so few solutions available to us?
What I think is that everyone should be able to see that some things are wrong, and that to do nothing about them makes us likewise accountable. If you can come up with a better way to to prevent those wrongs, then I am being honest when I say that I would like to hear of it.
no subject
And I plan to start by talking to them, after they get back from Lilith. A step you skipped right over.
no subject
Requiem and I may have disagreed on many things, but she wasn't trying to lie to herself that they're the kind to be won over with words alone.
I genuinely hope that your efforts make a difference. But it took more than pleasant conversation to convince Kharg, and he seemingly has a selfless heart.
no subject
But I've stopped God from doing things before. Her motivations are shallow, so she's pretty easily swayed, actually. You don't have to magically make them into good, selfless people to prevent them from murdering people.
no subject
I was just... irritated—that you seemed to be suggesting I should have tried negotiation before joining Heart Soldier in dealing with them both directly.
In the end, these are people who I would have supported being put to death, were we in my home. For that reason and no other did I come to Requiem with what I knew was an extreme suggestion.
But... as I've said, I still want what you are planning to work. Just because I believe that units are responsible for the actions of our own doesn't mean I relish the prospect of cruelty, much less think it should be the only option.
no subject
And that's exactly it. It was just your opinion, which no one asked you for. But you're so convinced your opinion is important and correct that you pushed for it, despite it being extreme. Isn't that basically the definition of being self-righteous?
no subject
I'm not sure I believe it so firmly, now, based on what you and Requiem have said. And I apologize if my intent appeared otherwise.
But I will not apologize to you for the sin of believing in my own principles.
no subject
I'm not asking you to apologize. I don't really care about making nice with you. But if you're expecting me to concede that you made a perfectly reasonable and principled suggestion, you're out of luck. I think you have self-centered delusions of righteousness that mean you'll feel perfectly justified in taking horrible actions as long as they're "principled," and you're just confirming that with everything you say. And I plan to treat you like you pose all the danger that implies.
no subject
You still like to make threats, I see. If you really weren't interested in doing anything except delivering one, then you might as well have done so from the start—you started this conversation, not me.
Really— "none of my business" that a child was killed? Only ZRAEL gets to have an opinion on that? And you want to call me self-centered. I actually was interested in the chance to mend some of this conflict, but I guess that's just my own little "delusion."
no subject
The fact that you think anything is your business if there's a "right thing to do" is the dangerous part. If you want to interpret that as a threat, interpret it as a threat. I'm just telling you how I see it, so we're clear. Unlike you, I don't decide how things are without even speaking to the people involved.
no subject
You might be speaking with me, but you're really not listening.
I told you already that, when I made that proposal, I saw it as advocating for what was, essentially, natural death—like going to Lethe—not the torture and complete erasure of the soul that you describe. And, even though there is no proof that your view of it is correct, I'm still willing to take it extremely seriously. But that is not good enough.
I came to Requiem as a friend, and backed off in the same conversation. I'm glad that she took it seriously enough to indeed bring it up with the rest of you, but from the start I understood you were more likely to prefer your own version of justice. But that is not good enough.
At the end of the day, your problem with me seemingly comes down to the fact that I have morals at all.
no subject
And you can have whatever morals you want. But no one put you in charge. You don't get to decide the right thing to do for other people.
no subject
But I do not claim it is my decision alone—nor would I wish it to be.
...As for the Damned... [ softer, more thinking aloud than anything ]
We know they can come back from it—LiliS is not the only unit to have had members of that kind. They aren't gone... but perhaps they have been trapped. And that's surely cruel and unnatural, too.
no subject
no subject
At that point, though, they're not really meant to—applying Creation's understanding of death, that is. But even then, it's true that they don't seem to reincarnate, or move on in any way. That is the part which, I must concede, concerns even me.
no subject
Well, maybe next time don't suggest something like that if even you have concerns.
no subject
I'm just thinking about it in more detail now, and more critically. It is not often that you learn that even an experience as universal as death isn't necessarily the same across worlds.
It would be worth considering, regardless, as part of trying to understand this place, but to be very frank I am also critiquing my own view as a gesture of good faith.
no subject
no subject
I've actually been thinking about it as an option for some time now. Asking myself what I would do if someone I knew became truly and irredeemably dangerous.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)