windsofwar (
windsofwar) wrote in
imeeji_frontstage2019-12-11 10:41 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- !days 180-189,
- !lives,
- amakura tomoe,
- five hargreeves,
- xia igarashi,
- ♪ giorno giovanna,
- ♪ hlasoh,
- ♪ kharg,
- ♪ shinguji korekiyo,
- ♪ sonia aragona,
- ♪ todoroki shouto,
- ♭ kaiba seto,
- ♭ norie,
- ♯ catra,
- ♯ catra (au),
- ♯ damian wayne,
- ♯ echo of ♯ noise,
- ♯ harukawa maki,
- ♯ kano shuuya,
- ♯ leonardo watch,
- ♯ nero
Live!!
Who: resident dragon man and you
Where: Lobby
When: 184 morning
Good morning, everyone! I've decided now is the best time for us all to have another debate, now that our guests have been excused.
As many of you know, most of those guests were like me. Damned from other shows, instructed to take part in the show to make it more entertaining. During the week, we all saw and did many things, and hopefully, no one is holding much of a grudge.
Especially toward Future is Now, because I offered to murder, but they refused, and tried to protect as many people as possible, and we still were victorious, some how. So they should be applauded!
That aside, there was also that. . .live. As someone who has also stabbed a child, it made me think. How exactly do I want to reach my goals, and what should I sacrifice to get there? Personally, I don't think my stance has changed much, but we definitely shouldn't stab children. Only deimos! So I apologize for my brash actions from before.
So my question for the rest of you, even though violence can't be completely avoided here, when is it an appropriate first choice of action? I imagine many of you may have had to make extremely hard calls this week, so I have to wonder. Please discuss.
Where: Lobby
When: 184 morning
Good morning, everyone! I've decided now is the best time for us all to have another debate, now that our guests have been excused.
As many of you know, most of those guests were like me. Damned from other shows, instructed to take part in the show to make it more entertaining. During the week, we all saw and did many things, and hopefully, no one is holding much of a grudge.
Especially toward Future is Now, because I offered to murder, but they refused, and tried to protect as many people as possible, and we still were victorious, some how. So they should be applauded!
That aside, there was also that. . .live. As someone who has also stabbed a child, it made me think. How exactly do I want to reach my goals, and what should I sacrifice to get there? Personally, I don't think my stance has changed much, but we definitely shouldn't stab children. Only deimos! So I apologize for my brash actions from before.
So my question for the rest of you, even though violence can't be completely avoided here, when is it an appropriate first choice of action? I imagine many of you may have had to make extremely hard calls this week, so I have to wonder. Please discuss.
no subject
Well, maybe next time don't suggest something like that if even you have concerns.
no subject
I'm just thinking about it in more detail now, and more critically. It is not often that you learn that even an experience as universal as death isn't necessarily the same across worlds.
It would be worth considering, regardless, as part of trying to understand this place, but to be very frank I am also critiquing my own view as a gesture of good faith.
no subject
no subject
I've actually been thinking about it as an option for some time now. Asking myself what I would do if someone I knew became truly and irredeemably dangerous.
no subject
no subject
It's really no business of yours, but the first time I brought it up was in speaking to a friend from my own world, as an option in the instance that she returned to the state she showed in some of her memories—because that would be a deadly serious situation, and this would have been a deadly serious option.
Unfortunately for all of us, that murder was not nearly so unique as to qualify as the only awful thing any of us have seen since Doll killed Shu all those seasons ago, only to revive harmlessly when her team won a game.
no subject
no subject
Doodleman, for example: He is dangerous, but in the way that a storm at sea is dangerous. It is his nature, and proper precautions can be taken to anticipate and avoid that part of him. It makes a difference, too, that it is clear how much he cares for others.
I can give you more examples if you wish. Perhaps even tell you what it was like to care for Dahlia.
no subject
I don't disagree that she doesn't care as much, but God is just as predictable as Doodle. Maybe more so. Again, why do you think your judgment on who's actively dangerous is better than anyone else's?
no subject
I trust my instincts, but even if I wanted to try to play lawgiver in that way, it wouldn't matter. By its very nature, choosing to permanently lock someone out is a decision that only their unitmates can make—and it would have to be completely unanimous even then.
So, in that regard, the fact that you think God can be controlled is alone enough to save her.
no subject
no subject
[ voice low, even ] In truth, I only contacted Requiem because I did not think it would ever be considered otherwise. And not because I think she owed me any kind of obligation, but because I thought it was a tactic that wouldn't occur to most people.
I don't know if there's a way I could have phrased things that wouldn't have made it seem like I was trying to pressure all of you, but regardless, I clearly failed in that.
no subject
no subject
I don't like to think of myself as cruel. But even without most of my memories, war has left its mark on me.
no subject
So what, your argument now is that ☆ZRAEL is too nice to think of something like that? You've been through more than all of us? You know we're a unit full of professional killers, non-human beings and the literal manifestation of human hatred, right?
no subject
You're also all very young, particularly now that the Unconquered Sun is gone. Even Requiem and Doodle—they've lived a very long time, but they're also both essentially still youths.
But, especially given that I don't know most of you very well, is it such a terrible thing that I would give you the credit of kindness?
no subject
And even assuming I accept you're right on all that, doesn't that mean you were suggesting that we "kind youths" do something to our unitmates that's so cruel we wouldn't even consider it as a possibility? And you're still trying to take the moral high ground, here?
no subject
Think what you like, Maki. I doubt anyone in the history of humankind has ever won an argument about "maturity," and I have no delusions of being the first.
[ teenagers. why are they like this. ]
I have said all I can, and, if nothing else, I hope it has convinced you that I meant no imposition on ZRAEL's choices. Based on our conversation, I would no longer be comfortable imposing the grey death on another—at least not without learning more on how death works in this place.
So you may give yourself that credit.
no subject
Mostly all you've convinced me of is that rather than thinking your ideas are better than ours because you're more righteous, you also think they're better than ours because we're naive and incompetent. But I guess I'll take the small comfort that you only meant it as benevolent guidance, or whatever, and not an actual direction.
no subject
I wouldn't go to the trouble of having this kind of long conversation if I didn't think it was worth it.
You're very...... stubborn.
But then, so am I.
[ dipping her head a touch ] May the rest of your day be well.
no subject