rollplayinghouse: (ga02)
Morning☆Glory (Harukawa Maki) ([personal profile] rollplayinghouse) wrote in [community profile] imeeji_frontstage2019-04-29 07:56 pm

live

Who: Maki + anyone
Where: A little ways from the hotel and on monitors near you
When: Day 112, late morning

[Has Maki even ever called a ☆ZRAEL live? Well, she appears to be doing it now. The backdrop of her monologue is the shaded facade of a building a few blocks away from the hotel.]

It has come to my attention that the vast majority of people here appear to be fine with letting future is now die in games. I could say some things about that, given all the things that Intensity does, and the sort of person that Angel is... but I understand. There are no good options in these games, and if you're not close with someone and you think it won't be that bad, sometimes that's the best choice you can make.

Which is why I'm using this live to give you another piece of information to consider, the next time you have to make that choice. From now on, anyone who attacks future is now in games will have to deal with me.

...I'm not speaking for my unit here, or for future is now. ☆ZRAEL may or may not retaliate. Future is now may retaliate on their own, too. But I definitely will retaliate. For the record, I'm known as the Ultimate Assassin, and I have a wide variety of methods... some flashier than others. I don't promise they'll be fatal, but I won't rule it out, either.

And I'm not interested in discussing whether or not you think this is fair. It doesn't matter if it's fair. It's a consequence. If you attack future is now, that's what will happen. Keep it in mind.

[And then she shuts off the live. But she's not too hard to find, if you want.]
sancrimony: (☨ 114)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-04-30 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
[ just sort of looking to him ]

. . . Well now, should I be threatening people too?
bluescreenwhitedragon: ([FB] These hips don't lie)

[personal profile] bluescreenwhitedragon 2019-04-30 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
[Tiredly:]

I don't think that's very on brand for you.
sancrimony: (♱ 038)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-04-30 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
It's not like I'll stop targeting your unit in games, but if it would help you have a better chance of surviving, perhaps I should?

[ the lowkey desire to protect Master ]
bluescreenwhitedragon: ([Ira-ira] Side-eye)

[personal profile] bluescreenwhitedragon 2019-04-30 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
One is for the other. If you're not going to stop targeting us in games, it'd be hypocritical if you asked others to do it for you.
sancrimony: (♱ 016)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-04-30 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
Shall I speak with my unitmates, then?
bluescreenwhitedragon: ([--] 003)

[personal profile] bluescreenwhitedragon 2019-04-30 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
[Just raises an eyebrow]

Don't you already have alliances?
sancrimony: (☨ 114)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-04-30 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
My goodness, our unit is loath to them. We have, perhaps in all, one non-aggression agreement?
bluescreenwhitedragon: Credit: iconic ([Smirk] Going to kidnap you)

[personal profile] bluescreenwhitedragon 2019-04-30 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
[Laughs at that. The first one yet this Live] Are they now?

Then yes, if you want to start a discussion.
sancrimony: (🕈 227)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-04-30 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Then, I'll speak with them.